Comments on: SOLO IP event notes http://www.tangible-ip.com/2008/solo-ip-event-notes.htm ipVA's blog on adding value through intellectual property Fri, 03 Feb 2012 18:43:03 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Jordan http://www.tangible-ip.com/2008/solo-ip-event-notes.htm/comment-page-1#comment-8 Jordan Tue, 09 Dec 2008 15:57:03 +0000 http://www.tangible-ip.com/?p=113#comment-8 Bruce and Erwin - thanks for the comments, no doubt partially triggered by this blog's unusually high ranking for "Global IP Law Service". Erwin, Bruce has further elaborated on his comments at the Solo IP event, which should address your concerns and show that I didn't misreport what was said. This post of course isn't a review of the service: It merely reports on the event. As such it doesn't go into detail about the product (or comparing it to others), but given some interest in the topic I might try to do an actual review sometime in the new year. Bruce and Erwin – thanks for the comments, no doubt partially triggered by this blog’s unusually high ranking for “Global IP Law Service”. Erwin, Bruce has further elaborated on his comments at the Solo IP event, which should address your concerns and show that I didn’t misreport what was said.

This post of course isn’t a review of the service: It merely reports on the event. As such it doesn’t go into detail about the product (or comparing it to others), but given some interest in the topic I might try to do an actual review sometime in the new year.

]]> By: Bruce Dullea http://www.tangible-ip.com/2008/solo-ip-event-notes.htm/comment-page-1#comment-7 Bruce Dullea Thu, 04 Dec 2008 14:10:39 +0000 http://www.tangible-ip.com/?p=113#comment-7 For the sake of clarity, I would like to add a comment. The statement made about GIPLS being an accompaniment was made in the realization that most IP attorneys currently subscribe to hard copy alternative sources. Even if this is the case, adding GIPLS would give them superior coverage and allow them to discontinue their hard copy alternatives as their word habits embrace the electronic product. Having said that, I also would like to add the following points which were covered during the presentation; The Global IP Law Service is the most authoritative, comprehensive, and up-to-date source of legal IP information currently available. It aggregates essential information from over 230 countries, and includes trademarks, patents, utility models, industrial designs and domain names. The information is all translated into English, and contains the most current coverage of IP practice and proceedings, guidelines and legislation across the globe. Although the competition provides coverage, GIPLS is superior and is designed as a sole source rather than an accompaniment to the current competitive offerings Bruce Dullea LexisNexis IP Sales Consultant For the sake of clarity, I would like to add a comment.

The statement made about GIPLS being an accompaniment was made in the realization that most IP attorneys currently subscribe to hard copy alternative sources. Even if this is the case, adding GIPLS would give them superior coverage and allow them to discontinue their hard copy alternatives as their word habits embrace the electronic product. Having said that, I also would like to add the following points which were covered during the presentation;

The Global IP Law Service is the most authoritative, comprehensive, and up-to-date source of legal IP information currently available. It aggregates essential information from over 230 countries, and includes trademarks, patents, utility models, industrial designs and domain names. The information is all translated into English, and contains the most current coverage of IP practice and proceedings, guidelines and legislation across the globe.

Although the competition provides coverage, GIPLS is superior and is designed as a sole source rather than an accompaniment to the current competitive offerings

Bruce Dullea
LexisNexis IP Sales Consultant

]]> By: Erwin Cortagerena http://www.tangible-ip.com/2008/solo-ip-event-notes.htm/comment-page-1#comment-6 Erwin Cortagerena Tue, 02 Dec 2008 18:53:24 +0000 http://www.tangible-ip.com/?p=113#comment-6 Dear Hatcher. I do not who told you the Global IP Law Service is just an accompaniment to sources of information like Kluwer Manual IP. But it is a big mistake. Actually, the Global IP Law Service is much more complete and updated than Kluwer Manual IP or any other offers in the market, printed or online. It not only has more territories, more sections, more support, but also it has a collection of +2,7000 legal entries and texts. We invite any current users of any other products to test side-by-side the Global IP Law Service. For more information about Global IP Law Service features, questions visit www.equerioncorp.com/globaliplaw or just send us an email to info@equerioncorp.com. Erwin Cortagerena Managing Director Equerion Information Services Corp. Global IP Law Service Dear Hatcher.
I do not who told you the Global IP Law Service is just an accompaniment to sources of information like Kluwer Manual IP. But it is a big mistake.

Actually, the Global IP Law Service is much more complete and updated than Kluwer Manual IP or any other offers in the market, printed or online. It not only has more territories, more sections, more support, but also it has a collection of +2,7000 legal entries and texts.

We invite any current users of any other products to test side-by-side the Global IP Law Service. For more information about Global IP Law Service features, questions visit http://www.equerioncorp.com/globaliplaw or just send us an email to info@equerioncorp.com.

Erwin Cortagerena
Managing Director
Equerion Information Services Corp.
Global IP Law Service

]]>